000 01331cam a22003254a 4500
999 _c14907
_d14907
001 16196439
003 ZA-BrSAT
005 20180223144048.0
008 100421s2010 enk b 001 0 eng c
010 _a 2010927167
015 _aGBB027477
_2bnb
016 7 _a015489040
_2Uk
020 _a9780199277421 (hardback : alk. paper)
020 _a0199277427 (hardback : alk. paper)
035 _a(OCoLC)ocn520712077
040 _aDLC
_cSTF
_dUKM
_dYDXCP
_dBWK
_dCDX
_dC#P
_dXII
_dBWX
_dDLC
042 _apcc
050 0 0 _aBS680.S854
_bS83 2010
082 0 0 _a231/.8
_222
100 1 _aStump, Eleonore,
_d1947-
245 1 0 _aWandering in darkness :
_bnarrative and the problem of suffering /
_cEleonore Stump.
260 _aOxford :
_bClarendon Press ;
_aOxford ;
_aNew York :
_bOxford University Press,
_c2010.
300 _axix, 668 p. ;
_c26 cm.
_bPDF
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [637]-651) and index.
520 _aOnly the most naïve or tendentious among us would deny the extent and intensity of suffering in the world. Can one hold, consistently with the common view of suffering in the world, that there is an omniscient, omnipotent, perfectly good God? This book argues that one can. Wandering in Darkness first presents the moral psychology and value theory within which one typical traditional theodicy, namely, that of Thomas Aquinas, is embedded. It explicates Aquinas's account of the good for human beings, including the nature of love and union among persons. Eleonore Stump also makes use of developments in neurobiology and developmental psychology to illuminate the nature of such union. Stump then turns to an examination of narratives. In a methodological section focused on epistemological issues, the book uses recent research involving autism spectrum disorder to argue that some philosophical problems are best considered in the context of narratives. Using the methodology argued for, the book gives detailed, innovative exegeses of the stories of Job, Samson, Abraham and Isaac, and Mary of Bethany. In the context of these stories and against the backdrop of Aquinas's other views, Stump presents Aquinas's own theodicy, and shows that Aquinas's theodicy gives a powerful explanation for God's allowing suffering. She concludes by arguing that this explanation constitutes a consistent and cogent defense for the problem of suffering.
600 1 0 _aThomas,
_cAquinas, Saint,
_d1225?-1274.
630 0 0 _aBible.
_pOld Testament
_xCriticism, interpretation, etc.
650 0 _aSuffering
_xBiblical teaching.
906 _a7
_bcbc
_cpccadap
_d2
_encip
_f20
_gy-gencatlg
942 _2ddc
_cEBK