Christian Creation Theories Rooted in the Genesis Account and Their Underlying Assumptions (Record no. 25)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02245nam a22001817a 4500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20220301063809.0 |
007 - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION FIXED FIELD--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | ta |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 160722s2012 s ||||fom| | 00| e eng d |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
Transcribing agency | ZA-BrSAT |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
9 (RLIN) | 75 |
Personal name | Janse van Rensburg, Michael |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Christian Creation Theories Rooted in the Genesis Account and Their Underlying Assumptions |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Johannesburg, South Africa |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | South African Theological Seminary |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2012 |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
Extent | 105 |
Other physical details | |
Dimensions | A4 |
Accompanying material | Abstract. Table of contents. Annexure. Bibliography. |
502 ## - DISSERTATION NOTE | |
Degree type | Master of Theology (Mth) |
Name of granting institution | South African Theological Seminary |
Year degree granted | 2012 |
Supervisors | |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | The objective of this study is to provide the reader with a holistic theological understanding of the current popular Christian creation theories. This was done through identifying, analysing, and comparing the key teachings of these theoriesagainst a biblical exegesisof Genesis 1:1 –2:3.Thisstudy reveals how each theory operatesfrom a defensive and subjective historical context in which the various proponents find justification for their specific perspectives. It further illustrates how specific theological principles form part of the meta-theoretical frameworks that support the different theories. From discussingthese frameworks it becomes clear how different opinions aboutthetheological principles of general-versus special revelation and physical-versus spiritual death result in tension between the various theories.Furthermore, this study argues that the creation account formed part of a literal-historical worldview in ancient Israelite society, but conservatively concludes that the current debate regarding the author intended historical timeframe and literary genre of the creation account in Genesis 1:1 –2:3 is inconclusive. Despite this conclusion, it indicates that modern day Christians can have a degree of certainty as to the theological intended meaning of the text.The study concludes with a discussion on some of the main assumptions of the different theories, illustrating how all of the theories face theological difficulties. |
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
9 (RLIN) | 20 |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | Bible and evolution |
General subdivision | Creation |
Geographic subdivision | SA |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
Koha item type | Thesis |
Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Collection code | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Barcode | Date last seen | Uniform Resource Identifier | Price effective from | Koha item type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dewey Decimal Classification | Electronic Holdings | South African Theological Seminary | South African Theological Seminary | Online Resource | 07/22/2016 | SATSPG16070008 | 07/22/2016 | https://sats-dspace.s3.af-south-1.amazonaws.com/Theses/THESIS_MTH_MINI_2012_JanseVanRensburgM.pdf | 07/22/2016 | Thesis |